• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

briq Newsroom

  • Timeline
  • Archive
  • In the Media
  • Press Lounge
  • German

News

Paper by briq researchers wins IRECC Award

February 25, 2022

The working paper “Fighting Climate Change: The Role of Norms, Preferences, and Moral Values” by briq and University of Bonn researchers Peter Andre, Teodora Boneva, Felix Chopra and Armin Falk has received the IRECC Award for “Innovative Research in the Economics of Climate Change” given by the Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) for the two best IZA Discussion Papers published in 2021 on the nature and implications of climate change.

The award-winning research addresses the role of social norms, individual preferences, and moral views in fighting climate change. The key finding of this experimental study: Many people contribute little to climate protection because they underestimate the willingness of others to fight global warming. Providing information on prevalent climate norms raises support for climate-friendly policies, particularly among climate-change skeptics [read more].

The second paper selected for the award, “Temperature, Workplace Safety, and Labor Market Inequality” by Jisung Park, Nora Pankratz and Patrick Behrer, illustrates that rising temperatures increase the risk of work injuries at both outdoor and indoor workplaces. Since low-wage earners are disproportionately affected, this may also exacerbate income inequality. This is a prime example of unexpected secondary effects of climate change that deserve further investigation [read more].

Worth 10,000 euros, the newly established IRECC Award recognizes important new insights into the broader, often underestimated consequences of climate change and the effects of environmental policies on society and the labor market. The inaugural IRECC winners “represent the best of modern applied-economics research,” according to the award committee made up of Susana Ferreira (University of Georgia), Andrew Oswald (University of Warwick, IZA) and Hilmar Schneider (IZA).

Filed Under: News Tagged With: climate

Botond Kőszegi to join briq research team

December 13, 2021

Starting in the summer of 2022, Botond Kőszegi will become a full-time professor at briq. He is currently University Professor at Central European University in Budapest, Hungary, after previous positions at the University of California, Berkeley, and a visiting position at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Holding a BA in mathematics from Harvard University in 1996, he received his PhD in economics from the MIT in 2000 as one of the first students to write a PhD thesis entirely on behavioral economics.

Having visited many times, I already know briq very well, and have experienced the intense and friendly environment that makes it a center of behavioral-economics research. I look forward to being part of it full time and helping to grow it further!

Over the past two decades he has published extensively on behavioral-economics topics – including several lead articles – in top journals such as the American Economic Review, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Review of Economic Studies, Journal of the European Economic Association, and Journal of Public Economics. He was also Managing Editor at the Review of Economic Studies.

Focusing primarily on the theoretical foundations of behavioral economics, Botond has produced research on self-control problems and the consumption and regulation of harmful products, self-image and anticipatory utility, reference-dependent preferences and loss aversion, markets for deceptive products, and misguided learning.

He has received European Research Council Grants in 2012 and 2018, and the Yrjö Jahnsson Award, a biennial award for the best economist in Europe under the age of 45, in 2015 (see video below).

“I am extremely happy, both academically and personally, that Botond will join us. This will clearly boost our behavioral economics research at briq and Bonn. Absolutely terrific!” said briq director Armin Falk.

Filed Under: News

Mentoring can reduce gender gap in competitiveness and earnings expectations

November 30, 2021

Competitiveness is an individual trait that has been shown to be highly predictive of career choices and labor market outcomes and for which a strong gender gap is often found. Gender differences in preferences for competition might therefore provide a partial explanation for gender disparities in career choices, such as differential selection into STEM fields or finance.

A new study by Teodora Boneva, Thomas Buser, Armin Falk and Fabian Kosse provides causal evidence on the impact of socioeconomic background at a young age on preferences for competition and gender differences in these preferences. The analysis is based on the briq family panel, consisting of families living in the German cities of Bonn and Cologne with children born between 2002 and 2004.

To isolate results on the effects of a change to the social environment, around 30 percent of the children in the sample were randomly assigned to a well-established and intensive mentoring program called “Baloo and You”. For a period of about one year, children are provided with a mentor whose brief it is to act as a role model and to enrich the social environment. Volunteer mentors are predominantly university students, and all girls are assigned to a female mentor, thereby exposing girls of low socioeconomic status (SES) to a successful female role model.

Mother’s competitiveness matters for girls

A first finding indicating a potential positive effect of the mentoring program is that the mother’s competitiveness has a positive effect on girls but not on boys. Thus, female role models might be particularly important for shaping girl’s competitiveness.

The broader results confirm earlier findings of significant differences in competitiveness between girls and boys, however the gender gap registered for adolescents with low socioeconomic background stands out. Socioeconomically disadvantaged girls are 4.5 times more likely to be found at the bottom of the competitiveness distribution than boys with comparable SES. On the other hand, girls profiting from a more favorable background (high SES) are “only” twice as likely to show very low competitiveness in comparison to boys with high SES.

The mentoring intervention significantly narrows the gender difference in competitiveness by increasing girls’ willingness to compete especially among those most averse to competition. The gap between the gender differences in competitiveness of the disadvantaged and the advantaged group is closed entirely.

Mentees raise their earnings expectations

A similar pattern emerges for earnings expectations. About six years after the intervention the authors administered a questionnaire in which they elicit the adolescents believe about their earnings at age 30. While the teenagers in this sample have not entered the labor market yet, data shows that there are already large gender gaps regarding expected earnings at this age, especially among the group of low SES adolescents.

Girls with poor socioeconomic background expect 36.7% lower earnings than boys exposed to a similar social environment. The gender gap in the group with high SES is only 8.8%. The intervention reduced the gender gap in the low SES group by 23.3 percentage points to 13.4%, which is statistically indistinguishable from the gender gap in the high SES group.

Taken together, the results suggest that girls with low socioeconomic status are doubly disadvantaged, by both their socioeconomic background and their gender, but that interventions can partially mitigate this disadvantage. The results have important policy implications: Providing adolescents with an enriched social environment may not only result in better outcomes for disadvantaged children but may also lead to a significant reduction in gender inequality.

Filed Under: News

Suanna Oh receives Distinguished CESifo Affiliate Award

November 8, 2021

Suanna Oh, briq postdoctoral fellow since September 2021, has been selected as the winner of this year’s Distinguished CESifo Affiliate Award in the area of behavioral economics. The prize is funded by the international CESifo research network based in Munich and aims at identifying promising young researchers. Previous winners include briq research director Florian Zimmermann and briq research affiliate Matt Lowe.

Oh’s paper “Does Identity Affect Labor Supply?” investigates this question in rural India, focusing on the effect of caste identity on job-specific labor supply. In a field experiment, laborers chose whether to take up various one-day job offers, which differed in associations with specific castes. Workers were less willing to accept offers that were linked to castes other than their own, especially when those castes ranked lower in the social hierarchy. Workers forewent large payments – ten times their daily wage for half of the sample – to avoid job offers that conflicted with their caste identity, regardless of whether these decisions were made in private.

Read more about the paper in a VoxDev column.

Filed Under: News

What’s worth knowing in economics?

September 17, 2021

Global survey of almost 10,000 academic economists shows: Many economists think that economic research should become more policy relevant, multidisciplinary, and disruptive, and pursue more diverse research topics.

Peter Andre

Science and research matter. They shape how we think about ourselves, how we live together, and how we design policies. What researchers work on, which topics they choose, and how they resolve trade-offs between different research objectives is therefore of central societal importance. However, the question about what is “interesting” and “worth knowing” cannot be answered scientifically. Instead, researchers must retreat to their intuition and personal value judgments.

Armin Falk

How do economists think about this “problem of problem choice”? Which fundamental research objectives do they think economists should pursue? Which research topics should they explore? In search for answers, briq researchers Peter Andre and Armin Falk conducted a global survey of almost 10,000 academic economists about their views on what is worth knowing in economics.

For details, download the full study or read the authors’ VoxEU column.

Filed Under: News

Why do some children lie and others don’t?

May 11, 2021

Reporting private information is a key part of economic decision making. A recent literature has found that many people have a preference for honest reporting, contrary to usual economic assumptions.

In a new working paper, Johannes Abeler, Armin Falk and Fabian Kosse investigate whether preferences for honesty are malleable and what determines them. Experimentally measuring preferences for honesty in a sample of children, the authors find that children from families with higher socio-economic status (SES) are more honest.

Causal effect of the social environment

The study uses data from the briq family panel, an annual survey of 700 families in the Cologne-Bonn region. To assess the causal effect of the social environment, children from low-SES households were randomly enrolled in a year-long mentoring program. The volunteer mentors spend an afternoon per week with the children and engage in interactive social activities such as cooking, playing football, or doing handicraft activities.

The mentoring program thus enriches the social environment of the children and widens their horizon by providing inputs and experiences that are potentially scarce in low-SES families and, at the same time, essential for the development of honesty preferences.

The researchers find that preferences for honesty are indeed malleable and that they can be changed by such an intervention: About four years after the end of the program, mentored children are significantly more honest. The results thus suggest that early-childhood interventions cannot just improve a child’s achievements but also affect their social and moral behavior.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: bfp, briq family panel, honesty

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 8
  • Go to Next Page »
  • Imprint
  • Privacy Policy
  • Status
© Deutsche Post STIFTUNG